|
Because
content counts...
Reusable learning objects
Unlocking content
Distributed development
Peer-review
Evaluation
A
community of practice
How to join
Benefits of partnership
FAQs
|
|
Peer-review
To ensure quality
of all UCeL materials, we have developed a robust two-stage peer-review
process.
In the first stage
of quality assurance, the content specification is peer-reviewed and marked
according to a structured scheme by a subject expert who assesses the
material for factual accuracy, appropriateness of media choices, effectiveness
of assessment etc. Having passed this stage, the specification is then
developed into the online resource. It is then re-assessed by the same
reviewer to ensure that it is still "fit for purpose" and now
the interactions, animations etc are also evaluated for their level of
appropriateness and engagement.
Peer-reviewers are
subject experts from UCeL partner institutions, but are not from the institution
where the material they are assessing was created or developed. Their
expert knowledge is another shared benefit for the community.
<previous
| next >
|
Universities'
Collaboration in eLearning (UCEL)